Conrad Noise Hearing Draws Unexpected Attendance
The hearing in Municipal District v. Conrad (AMNC-2026-011A) took place Monday to what the Clerk's office described as "the fullest gallery since Finch v. Finch."
Conrad, representing himself, arrived with prepared remarks and what he described as "a contextual performance sample." Hon. M. Owl denied the sample before it began.
Testimony from three residents of Municipal Oak described the pre-dawn performances as "impossible to sleep through," "deliberately aimed at specific windows," and, from one witness, "honestly pretty good, which makes it worse."
Conrad argued that his singing constituted protected expression. The Court noted that protection does not extend to 4:30 AM or to material that two witnesses independently identified as "a reenactment of someone else's divorce."
A ruling is expected within the week. Conrad was observed on his usual branch at approximately 5:15 AM the following morning. He was not singing. He was, according to one neighbor, "sitting there in a way that felt like a warning."